Monthly Archive for July, 2008

Page 2 of 3

Issa, Bilbray on Duke’s Clemency

From the North County Times:

“I don’t think I can overstate the damage that Mr. Cunningham did to the institution of government,” U.S. Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Solana Beach, said Monday. “The damage done by Randy Cunningham was deep and broad.”

And…

U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, said: “I know of no reason at this time that would make a commutation of the sentence appropriate.”

Nice to see that corruption isn’t a partisan issue.

But wait! Someone’s missing here. Who could it be?

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Border Fence. Hunter is the dean of San Diego’s congressional delegation, who is retiring from office and bequeathing his seat to his son, also named Duncan Hunter. The elder Hunter recruited Cunningham for Congress, taught him how to sing and dance, got the evangelicals to back Duke.

Duncan’s already forgiven Duke, and thinks all Good Christians should too.

“I think that as Christians, if we can forgive our enemies, we can certainly forgive our friends. So I didn’t run away from Cunningham,” he told the LA Times.

Of course, Duncan doesn’t have the grace in his heart to forgive criminals. Except for his friend Duke.

On Gen. Wesley Clark

Gen. Wesley Clark got in a lot of trouble for comments he made on Face the Nation about Sen. John McCain’s qualifications for office.

SCHIEFFER: I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot down. I mean –

CLARK: Well, I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president.

(Transcript here)

Eve though Clark had earlier called McCain, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, a hero for his service as a prisoner of war, his comment above — stripped of its context — became fodder for the crude, overly simplistic tit-for-tat world of American politics today.

Clark is a former Democratic presidential candidate who has endorsed Barack Obama, so he must have been speaking as a politician, not a retired general.

McCain spokesman Brian Rogers saw the angle right away and pounced:

“Let’s please drop the pretense that Barack Obama stands for a new type of politics. The reality is he’s proving to be a typical politician who is willing to say anything to get elected, including allowing his campaign surrogates to demean and attack John McCain’s military service record.”

The media, smelling blood, dove right in.  CNN’s Rick Sanchez said “Wesley Clark tried to Swiftboat John McCain today.” BANG! The Washington Post’s ubiquitous Howie Kurtz said Clark had used his appearance on Face the Nation to “strafe” McCain. Politico.com called it “one of the more personal attacks on the Republican presidential nominee this election cycle.” CRACK!

Clark’s remark may be an inartful snap judgment, but it also happens to be true.

Like McCain, Randy “Duke” Cunningham was shot down over North Vietnam in May 10, 1972, the day he became the first fighter ace of the Vietnam War. He avoided capture because U.S. forces came to his rescue.

Cunningham was by no means qualified to be a congressman, let alone president, and yet, he served for 15 years until he was finally revealed as the most corrupt congressman of all time.

It’s what Cunningham and McCain did after they were shot down that proved their mettle as men.

McCain spent six years in a prisoner of war camp. When he was offered release, McCain refused. The son of a Navy admiral would not allow himself to be used for enemy propaganda. As a result, he was routinely tortured and beaten.

And what did Cunningham do? Well, that’s  exactly what my book Feasting on the Spoils is about.

Cunningham became a professional “war hero. He came to resent his commanders when they tried to hold him accountable. He grew envious of other pilots and remained bitter that he never got the Medal of Honor. He believed the rest of his life should be an extended coronation. His ego grew to a monstrous size that always wanted more and more, and Cunningham bullied his way to power.

Getting shot down alone isn’t a qualification. It’s what we make of ourselves and how we respond when tested that matters.

Clemency Confirmed

Just got off the phone with the Department of Justice’s Office of the Pardon Attorney. The office confirmed what the NY Times reported over the weekend:  imprisoned former Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham has applied for a commutation from President Bush. (Hey, I had to make sure!) In addition, his application was submitted sometime in 2007. They wouldn’t answer any other questions. More soon.

Still More on Duke’s Clemency

Who’s the attorney/firm handling Duke’s clemency request? It’s not Lee Blalack and the folks at O’Melveny & Myers, who represented Duke through his plea and sentencing and continue to represent him regarding his cooperation agreement with the government. If anybody knows who’s behind this, please let me know.

CBS Discovers MZM

CBS had an “exclusive” report on how Duke Cunningham briber Mitch Wade didn’t do such a good job of detecting roadside bombs in Iraq.

I’m shocked — shocked! — to learn that Cunningham used classified earmarks to sneak money to his friend’s company, MZM. And get this, the congressman’s friend was bribing him with yachts and antiques! The earmarks were a waste of money!  Soldiers got totally screwed! And it could happen again today because Congress is still stuffed with dirtbags!

Hey Couric & Co, you really knocked that one out of the park.

More on Duke’s Clemency Request

According to the Department of Justice website,

Generally, commutation of sentence is an extraordinary remedy that is rarely granted.

The statistics bear out that it’s easier to get a pardon than a commutation. Clinton  granted 396 of the 2,001 pardon requests he received, but granted only 61 of more than 5,400 requests for clemency. In the previous 12 years of Bush and Reagan, clemency requests were granted only 16 times.

Again, from the DOJ:

Appropriate grounds for considering commutation have traditionally included disparity or undue severity of sentence, critical illness or old age, and meritorious service rendered to the government by the petitioner, e.g., cooperation with investigative or prosecutive efforts that has not been adequately rewarded by other official action.

During his sentencing, defense attorneys made much of Duke’s history of prostate cancer. And the former congressman has cooperated with the investigation, even though prosecutors never called him as a witness at the trial of Brent Wilkes, for reasons that remain unclear.

Pardon Me!

Seems like Brent Wilkes isn’t the only one who wants out of jail.  The New York Times reports that Duke is seeking a pardon from President Bush:

In addition, prominent federal inmates are asking Mr. Bush to commute their sentences. Among them are Randy Cunningham, the former Republican congressman from California; Edwin W. Edwards, a former Democratic governor of Louisiana; John Walker Lindh, the so-called American Taliban; and Marion Jones, the former Olympic sprinter.

The requests are adding to a backlog of nearly 2,300 pending petitions, most from “ordinary people who committed garden-variety crimes,” said Margaret Colgate Love, a clemency lawyer.

In 2002, when Duke was in Congress, he tried to get a pardon for Tommy K., the Greek businessman and convicted felon who had purchased the honorable gentleman’s yacht. Today, the 66-year-old Cunningham is in a federal prison “camp” in Tuscon with an expected release date of 2013.

Jimmy Hoffa, Richard Nixon, Marc Rich, Patty Hearst all got pardons, so maybe Duke’s got a shot.

Idiocracy

From The L Magazine

UPDATE: A friend writes, “You ARE awsome. And I admire you for not being ashamed to show skin on your blog. Very healthy color; clearly you’re getting your Omega-3. But I hope you can get the other two tats removed—I would have stopped at one. Nevertheless, you’ve insipred me, and I’m running out to get my own shoulder-length “Nollige Is Good” right now.”

Brent Wilkes’ Secret Admirer

So, a secret admirer of Brent Wilkes wants to help him get out of prison.

The former defense contractor was sentenced in February to 12 years for bribing former Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham with hookers, cash, and meals at DC’s Capital Grille. But Wilkes has been eating daily specials at Terminal Island FCI in San Pedro because he can’t come up with $1.4 million in collateral to secure relase.

A few days ago, his attorney said that some unnamed person was willing to bail Wilkes out, but only if he or she can shield their identity from everyone but Judge Larry Burns. Mr. or Mrs. X was concerned that public disclosure would impact his or her ability to make a living.

This seems a bit odd. If you can plunk down the couple hundred Gs Wilkes needs (his family has pledged the rest) your livelihood would seem to be fairly secure, no?

Not surprisingly, prosecutors don’t like this. According to them, Wilkes has misled the court with “false affidavits and questionable dealings” over his assets:

…the government believes that the sealing of traditionally open proceedings, which may prove crucial to securing the defendant’s release, will only raise the specter of undue influence and favoritism being exercised on behalf of a formerly well-heeled, white collar criminal that would not be afforded to his less-advantaged fellow felons.

The government only likes secrecy when it suits its own interests. Prosecutors bent over backward for fellow Cunningham briber Tommy K., who pleaded guilty in a secret hearing and then flew off to stay at a 5-star hotel in Greece.  We still don’t know why that happened because … the government is still keeping secrets!

A hearing is set for later this month. I think Wilkes will be wearing his jumpsuit and plastic sandals for a while longer. Judge Burns doesn’t seem to like Wilkes very much. Burns said he “doubts Mr. Wilkes’ trustworthiness” because Wilkes testified he had never seen the prostitute who screwed him in Hawaii. Twice.

If You Think Bush’s Approval is Low…

07/01/2008 Survey of 1,000 Likely Voters by Rasmussen Reports

“Okay, how do you rate the way that Congress is doing its job?”

2% Excellent
7% Good
36% Fair
52% Poor
2% Not sure

Congratulations, Congress! Single digit (9 percent) approval ratings! A new low!